View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-20-2010, 06:01 PM
Savard18 Savard18 is offline
Aviak

Savard18's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liveitup1216 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
and as for them being not needed/desired in raids/groups, i don't see how that is a viable argument at all. why have rangers in that case other than "its classic".

im not demanding them, but saying i dont see what "headache" it'd cause to simply allow the class to be played for people who want to, long after velious is released ofc.
But this is a classic server.

Rangers = classic
Beastlords = Not
P99 = classic

Not sure if I get your point. Rangers don't need special attention to add - granted I am not a programmer, but I assume a headache would be adding Beastlords to all the gear, quests, zones, etc. that are out there except for Vah Shir since they won't be available. Plus making quests for gear in zones they might not have them... I don't think Velious gear was added for Beastlords after Luclin came out, or PoSky - don't quote me on that but you know people would complain about not having quest gear.

There is a reason they aren't adding Luclin and anything else after, because it was the begining of the suck for EQ at that expansion, and everything else after was a little shittier until all that is left is the shitball that EQLive is today.

Topping everything off, the Beastlord class added no real value to EQ, at least zerkers are great DPS after mass AA's, but Beastlords just sit there and suck. The argument of adding them in cause it doesn't hurt is not really valid.
Last edited by Savard18; 09-20-2010 at 06:04 PM..