Champion_Standing and Mirana
I understand your logic and interpretation of the situation.
The point I am trying to make is:
-If this new software is GM approved, then turning off in-game maps becomes a moot point, since this software not only duplicates its function, but actually enhances it.
Which leads to 2 possible situations:
a) GM allow in-game maps back, going against their previous decision based on the fact that's maps were not classic
OR
b) GM still disallow in-game maps, while letting even more powerful map system to operate, which leads to rather amusing stance of "In game maps are not classic so you can't use them, but using 3rd party tools that do exactly same thing is ok"
To show you why this situation is awkward from logical point of view, consider this analogy:
-During Great Depression US Government forbid sale and production of Alcohol. Now imagine a situation where government only forbid production and sale of alcohol by organizations, but not individuals: so it would be illegal to buy alcohol in a store, but its ok to brew it at home and consume in any amount.
__________________
Quote:
[Rogean;750468]
Aren't you suppose to be banned?
[Zuranthium;1453395]
The people who invented the first space ships were brilliant. That doesn't mean anybody should actually want to use them 200 years later. Ideas are limited by means of execution. Everquest has amazing ideas that need to be completely reworked in their execution, in order for classic Everquest as it was envisioned to actually exist and continue to be relevant as things have evolved.
|
|