Quote:
Originally Posted by Alawen Everywhere
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, it's just a coincidence that I used the words "favoritism" and "inequality" in my first post. You've got me all figured out. My real point was... wait, what was it?
I went off on random tangents because there's nothing here to discuss with any of you. The people from IB love to play rules lawyer even though they lose that game to DA almost every time and, of course, they're all thinking OH MY GOD YOU CAN'T CHANGE OUR NAME WE ARE IB!!! The powers that be made it clear that the answer to my concern is "we'll do whatever we please" and I'm quite alright with that. The rule of man works fine until you piss off all the neighborhood kids and you're sitting in your sandbox alone.
|
You STILL don't get it? It has nothing to do with favoritism. It's not like they are allowing IB or LifeAlert to keep our copyrighted guild tags just because they love us, or out of "discretion". It's because it's actually
not against the rules for us to have such names. Their answer to your idiotic concern wasn't that they have the "right" to not change IB's name - it was pretty clearly that the rule in question simply doesn't affect guild names. I've been saying this for the past three posts. How can you act like you're justified in ignoring everything I say as if you can predict where it's going to lead, when you're still at fucking square one?
And stop with the doomsday-prophetic nonsense. It's really just asinine.