Yes, it's just a coincidence that I used the words "favoritism" and "inequality" in my first post. You've got me all figured out. My real point was... wait, what was it?
I went off on random tangents because there's nothing here to discuss with any of you. The people from IB love to play rules lawyer even though they lose that game to DA almost every time and, of course, they're all thinking OH MY GOD YOU CAN'T CHANGE OUR NAME WE ARE IB!!! The powers that be made it clear that the answer to my concern is "we'll do whatever we please" and I'm quite alright with that. The rule of man works fine until you piss off all the neighborhood kids and you're sitting in your sandbox alone.
Starklen wanted to get personal, so we got personal. He seemed to get upset! None of my early posts were directed at any individual or I would have named the individual(s). Then the post was moved to R&F and got ridiculous, so I got ridiculous back.
I hope at least some people reading this have the perspective to realize how funny it was; I laughed out loud at both some of the things I said and at some of the things you said after the thread was moved.
I wonder if you, Bagzan, can see the irony in your personal attacks on me. I don't communicate the way I do in order to impress you; I communicate this way because this is the way I communicate.
TL;DR Yes, the second half of this thread has been an exercise in immaturity. I'm over myself, are you?
|