Quote:
Originally Posted by Messianic
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In which case a backup healer/shaman/second CC (Bard + Chanter for example) is still more effective than a "safety valve" that can deal, at most (if we ignore what happens if he gets aggro from unloading his mana), about 3.1 x total mana (Estimated at 2700ish x 3 so 8100... still pitiful compared to what a necro who absolutely bombs dots and feigns can do) prior to 60.
|
Ok.
Quote:
|
Second CC class is better. Even two enchanters in the same group is better still than a chanter and a wizard.
|
I guess you're right on that.
Quote:
|
Have you actually calculated the burst of a Mag pet + mag nukes or Necro pet + necro nukes or chanter charmed pet + chanter nukes or druid charmed pet (if you happen to be so lucky, i.e. plane of hate) + druid nukes?
|
No but i have calculated that when Venus aligns with the second moon of the third month of an even year, very situational things happen once in a while.
Quote:
|
If brutal awesomeness is the total HP level of the weakest mobs in seb for an entire mana bar.
|
Well considering the weakest mob in seb is a lvl 41 Froglok Kor Shaman with 2091hp, i'd say you're wrong on this one. Wizards can't 2-shot Trak though.
Quote:
|
I wonder if the numbers actually bear this out.
|
I wonder too. I'm going to cross-post to the math forums and get back to you.
Quote:
|
That's chanter/bard/druid/shaman.
|
Possible, but i think cleric/cleric/cleric/cleric would even be better.
I guess you were right man, i viewed wizards as suck, then awesome and now they're back to suck. If i was OP i'd reroll a chanterdruidbardshaman with a hate pet that can necrodotbomb and FD.
I'd still log on the wiz to port for plat, even though druids are better because they have sow.