Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiggles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pfft casual
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
Obviously the equation approaches 0 error at a=255 because your original statement puts it at a 100% capture rate. There's no reason to expand that formula really unless maybe they're covering for their random generator being bad or something? Honestly I'm not sure what they're going for.
Ps: I just texted Eashan...he called me at PAX about your boxing video!! Where is that shit?!