View Single Post
  #327  
Old 04-14-2014, 03:43 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually no it cannot. It's actually a scientific fact that it cannot. See law of biogenesis and cell theory. All cells must come from previously existing cells and all cells are the base unit of structure of ALL living things. Since cells did not always exist and all cells must come from previously existing cells, it's a literal impossibility that the first cell was created through random chemical reactions. Science and an unlimited amount of evidence is on my side, not yours. Show me evidence to the contrary please? Show me random chemical reactions producing DNA? Oh right, you can't. Not looking to good for you bro...




No that's not my logic entirely. However the unimaginable complexity of DNA does suggest it was intelligently devised. What really puts the final nail in the coffin is the fact that DNA contains a language written with a 4 letter alphabet that utilizes chemicals arranged in extremely specific orders that provide the instructions and blue prints on how to build a living organism. A language can only be the product of an intelligent being.



Saying that DNA formed on it's own from random chemical reactions is like saying that the code used to create EQ formed randomly on it's own. In other words, it's about as retarded as you can possibly get.
here, read:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/

also, your attribution of dna being a language is merely a valuated metaphor used in order to help describe how dna works in layman's terms. the language used when talking about dna doesn't prove that it was created. the chemicals were labeled by humans in human made laboratories. they didn't look at it and it was all nicely labeled for them in whichever language they spoke. and why haven't you tried to counter my claim of the a priori model not allowing for the existence of god?

computer code isn't comparable to organic chemistry. cogito ergo sum failed you hard. it's okay though. your troll is tired too.
__________________