Quote:
Originally Posted by valarmorghulis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No sorry I don't feels because what you just said is completely retarded. The only thing a reptile can produce is more reptiles. They can't evolve into another creature. If it's a frog now, it will always be a frog and has always been a frog. Frog's can only produce more frogs and frogs can only come from other frogs. If it's a snake now, it will always be a snake and has always been a snake. Snakes can only produce more snakes and snakes can only come from other snakes.
The same goes for literally every single living thing on this planet. Every living thing can only produce more of what it already is. Birds make more birds, dogs make more dogs, cats make more cats etc. This can be broken down even further. For instance a blue jay can only produce more blue jays and a blue jay can only come from previously existing blue jays. A German shepherd can only produce more German shepherds and can only come from previously existing German shepherds. A tiger can only produce more tigers and tigers can only come from previously existing tigers.
Sorry but no, we did not evolve from reptiles. In fact, reptiles have never evolved into anything other than more reptiles.
|
We didn't evolve from apes either, like the majority of the population STILL believes, they think just because it's written in a school or University book, then it must be true!
However, for the sake of a discussion, if we DID evolve from apes, why are the apes still around again?? The evolution theory is about survival of the fittest, so if we had evolved from apes, the apes would no longer be around, if we stick within the boundaries of the theory to begin with.