Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarkov
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The principle of the thing is obvious. No one could sensibly argue otherwise.
I guess the question is, should community reaction to the feature drive your priorities, since you're working with limited time & resources here? Dunno, your call.
No one would be sad if this was a priority negative 50 fix though. Just sayin.
|
It is my belief that a human being VERY RARELY chooses to nerf itself, if ever.
I don't see that anyone would agree with implementing it, but I don't agree that's a reason we shouldn't do it.
It's like we are recreating a historical event, and saying, hey guys no one likes black powder guns, we should use automatics.
Matter of opinion I suppose. I know for a fact there are situations that would have ended poorly due to user-error, that aren't happening because of a safety feature.