Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sloan would have been an acceptable co-leader and I think Getsome and the rest of IB would have accepted those terms so long as we merged under the IB tag. There's a difference between attempting to take advantage of you guys and realizing that partnering with a guild led by Unbrella & Co was a bad situation.
|
Way back then, I remember talking to an IB person and asking if it would be acceptable if Getsome could be sole leader with the stipulation that if/when Sloan ever came back he could have Co-leader. I was told that was out of the question. This was when negotiations were just starting to deteriorate, but before TMO was being talked to seriously. I thought that was a reasonable compromise. Unbrella didn't even want co-guild leader for himself. We just wanted the leadership to be shared in some way.
There were three things that were even up for negotiation. Loot system, guild name, and guild leadership. You guys wouldn't budge on the first two. We just wanted you to meet us halfway on something. If our leaders were unacceptable. Why couldn't we compromise on a guild name?