Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonecrush
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Elves would strike a three way alliance.
The High elves and wood elves believe in Tunare. Their mother.
The third branch to this alliance would be the wood elves with the Halfings. The halfling druids pray to Karana, the rain maker. They'd 'bring the rain" to their Kelethin immune to fire attacks.
The Human race is highly divided. EFP and WFP would try to do the work without NFP (healers). Unless the city was laid siege too and all of the major players involved were hit equally this city will fall. Qeynos is in the same situation. Although, I'd say Erudin would be more likey to strike an alliance with Qeynos than Paineel. Qeynos is to far for FP to grant aide. They are on their own. All ports into these areas lead to contested grounds (Nro) being the only exception. They are also vulnerable at sea. Attacks can come around their waters through their catacombs. They will have a lot of difficulties deal with on stopping infultration.
The Eurdites. They have more defenses and their own lands but they have similar vulnerabilities as man. Divided between Erudin and Paineel. Erudin can be attacked from the sea.
The Dark Elves would run Antonica like a raging torrent.
The Iksars would hold Kunark pretty well. The OT and FV being outposts and starting points for attack.
More later.
|
As I mentioned earlier, we should avoid "making alliances" without a solid plotline that divides a majority of Norrath's races
"I think the stipulation is more that of an all vs all war. It's illogical, but necessary for the discussion at hand. Otherwise, this just turns into an all the good guys vs all of the bad guys scenario. If you want to pick teams, you have to come up with a plot as to how the war started, and why it is so controversial that there are so many sides.
So in this way, Dark Elves are unable to utilize the fatties.
Edit: My best go at a controversial war plotline is a battle of religions."