View Single Post
  #376  
Old 02-24-2014, 08:27 AM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Really you are equating an unbanned account to duping plat?

You 100% know that duping plat is a INGAME exploit that is obviously something that is not intended.

Accounts are banned and unbanned which is something that is not a "server error". Someone made a "mechanical error" and actually unbanned all of those accounts.

How many times have accounts been banned and then unbanned compared to the number of times that a plat exploit has appeared from a "server error"

This is not even close to being the same thing.

This is not about rebanning the people that were banned...this is about those people that were banned by association. Do you really think that the few petty items that was removed was something these players said "sure i will risk being banned because i know that this account is banned and should not be"?

You are really stretching and requiring a burden of accountability to be placed on the players for a GM mistake that is clearly something that is not beyond the norm for Project 1999.

Why not be arbitrary and at least give players caught up in this mess a chance to return items and be honest about it. Instead of simply banning them and continuing to stain the server with another poorly wrought decision that only hurts the population?
Dude let it go

The fact that they were quickly stripped is incriminating

They got a chance to return the items and didnt

What more do u want?

The only thing i agree is someone getting banned over receiving pixels that he didnt know were contaminated shouldnt happen.