Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why would boxing make this better? Then the necro with the SMR will just have 3 mules camped there afk. At least you can go get him banned right now for boxing. If the necro was forced to only have 1 character logged in he would leave since he has the smr, and the camp would be yours.
|
I never said boxing would improve the situation. It just won't make it dramatically worse like everyone seems to think. Whats the difference between a necro solo camping it and passing the loot to an AFK friend, or blatantly standing up a party to go camp the thing? In neither situation do *I* get my turn. The other option is just log/port/gate the alt out and bring in a new 'AFK friend'.
And we both know that as soon as he's done, the already broken spawn will just go to a guildmember or friend for their PL train.
It seems to me the ones screaming anti-box the loudest are the ones that play the premier solo classes. I'd love to hear a warrior weigh in and tell me he wouldn't want the ability to have a pocket healer. Maybe there wouldn't be such a shortage of warriors then.
So we're clear, I *DO NOT* support allowing 6-boxing. I think that 2-boxing is plenty and would resolve several of the grouping issues suffered by the majority of classes playing casually. Hell, I don't even 6-box on PEQ, I duo or trio.