Quote:
Originally Posted by baramur
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The issue is any class-c guild should be able to compete for any class-c mob, not restricted. There should never be a circumstance where Class-C mobs are not able to be engaged by Class-c period. The idea of the 2 classes was to divide the mobs equally among PLAY STYLES not GUILDS, yet you are justifying more mobs for R-Class on respawn because of the number of guilds. The whole point of Class-Competition was that any class-c mob would be in danger of being taken at any time, whether it be another class-c or a class-r guild. But FFA mobs are not really FFA if they take away a Class-C ability to attack a Class-c mob due to lockout. That CONTRADICTS the even playing field for Class-R and Class-C, which oddly the even share of mobs per class style is what Class-R kept preaching in raid negotiations. I never heard mention during the negotions that class-c should ever be restricted for killing class-c mobs, after all Class-R never is. You keep falling back to vp as being mobs handed to class-c, ok make them FFA all the time. See what the result would be. It is pointless arguing its simple math, the 2-mob cap makes FFA mobs not FFA for class-c cause it makes them trade on their 1/1/1 mob for a ffa, where it does not make Class-R, give up a Class-r mob to class-c, in order to kill a FFA. This would basically mean that Class-R is given more open world mobs, because they do not wish to compete in vp?
|
The problem with removing a bag limit on C class though, while I agree in principle, is in practice then FFA mobs will be taken out first with an agreement made in C to not touch C mobs until FFA mobs are dead, imo. Why do I think that? You did it for VP on this spawn. Why didn't anyone enter VP until good mobs outside VP were dead? The bag limit makes you weigh your decisions more heavily, while still getting the majority of the server's kills within the class C guilds.