Glocks are just for the tacticool crowd. They are ultra reliable under adverse conditions and easy to strip/clean, but are not nearly the best choice for either accuracy or handling. Unless you live in a tent in Somalia, I don't know why you would spend a premium to own a weapon which has compromised a certain level of precision in order to be able to operate under those types of conditions. A mid range .45(around $800) would serve anyone in a first world country far better than a Glock. I would also take CZ over a Glock any day, and have $100+ to blow on ammo.
PS: That Judge/Governor is too big for anything but a backpack and I can't even imagine how crappy it would feel to actually shoot if the only engagement range I was concerned with was less than 10 yards.
|