Quote:
Originally Posted by Razdeline
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Then why even play? Seriously, this game is purely and fundamentally FFA.
Stop using the argument that there will be trains, that you won't get mobs(you will get more mobs with ANY of these plans than in the past), and that the raid scene will be this absolute quintessential shit show that it was. Everyone has agreed and is trying to move past that, however it seems you are unable to.
I am hoping you do not represent BDA entirely. By reading everything in the raid discussion it is clear you are overly emotional to make any type of logical and sane argument or proposal.
|
T1 - 50/50 of all raid targets outside VP, excluding Inny/CT/VS/Trak which is 1/3
T2 - 50/50 of all raid targets outside VP, excluding Inny/CT/VS/Trak which is 1/3
VP is FFA as well as 1/3 of the Inny/CT/VS/Trak spawns.
T1 is more "competitive" and stands to gain the FFA targets more (they put their money where their mouth is)
T2 is more leaning towards a rotation and don't stand to gain as much among each other.
The top tier mobs that FE/TMO/IB want Inny/CT/VS/Trak (which has been the reason every proposal has failed almost) basically have their rule set applied twice (unless they decide to change their FFA mentality)
T1 = TMO / FE / IB (if they choose)
T2 = all other guilds
T1 = their own rules
T2 = Their own rules
Any new guild can choose which to jump into, but are locked into it. This means any guild can choose between 2 different raiding styles and there are still ffa targets for the entire server (however they are heavily contested).
Repops still need to be addressed on how they'd be handled by staff/players, but everything seems to suggest FFA with a small bag limit.
Tier lock duration, as well as many other things are left open to debate and refine.
Raz, would you support this?
Also, where is my sig picture i made you?