Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have no issues with compromise (see my unbiased post) but I think its absolutely hilarious that TMO and FE can "cut their losses" on 25% of the mobs they would normally take to divide amongst the rest of the server, then peddle their idea as the epitome of fairness.
|
What you don't seem to get is... TMO/FE-IB compete with each other. A guild in that competition could get less mobs a month with this arrangement than say a BDA or Taken. For Example Say BDA and Taken continue to kill Vox and Inny regularly as they were before. Then both those guilds split Gore and Talendor on the non priority list. THEN they get a week of uncontested competition on Trak/VS/FAY/SEV/CT/INNY/Vox/Naggy.
Taken or BDA could end up with more kills than FE-IB or TMO depending how the competition goes between those 2 guilds in a particular month. Now as I said I don't think this goes far enough but you guys saying it isn't fair are blind...A guild could get more kills in a month than one of those 2 with this system. I however would like to see a system that gives guilds that aren't hardcore and hasn't killed anything before more of an opportunity at a mob. Dunno if we will ever see it however.