Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now you've pissed me off and are full of shit, and I have no sympathy that you lost the camp.
I showed up and asked your two groups to reach an amicable decision for both of you. I specifically stated that if you couldn't reach an agreement, nobody would like the call I made. The IB group offered you either FTE or /ran to decide the camp multiple times, and your group (I'm going to assume you are grundlegore, whether or not that's true, he was speaking for your group) essentially told them to politely fuckoff.
[Fri Dec 06 18:15:06 2013] Grundlegore says, 'I mean IB is fine just watching us kill tranix Im cool with that'
This is the last thing your group said after I asked if you guys were unable to reach your own decision, as in, you were ready for me to mediate your dispute. If you were "happy to approach the situation this way" you would have accepted IB's offer of going with FTE.
I'd also like to cut you off before you go putting more words in my mouth like you were trying to do earlier and state that this is NOT how all camps are to be decided. This is how THIS camp in THIS situation was handled because I had nothing to prove that either of you were there and holding the camp prior to me arriving to mediate. You were both telling me a different story, so I let it go to random chance.
Stop crying about how the "big bad dum gm deru" fucked you over and try to work shit out on your own like a respectable human being next time, thanks.
|
So group that has no legitimate claim to the camp gets A: chance to win it through roll, or B: chance to win it through FTE, while group with legitimate claim is screwed either way. Its not so much the call you made but the total lack of consistency not even week to week or month to month but literally hour to hour as you just explained this rule earlier in the day in a now locked thread. You say you have no proof either way yet if you really want I can go dig up my logs where you say in game you can see that our group was killing FGs and they IB were not. What more proof is needed? Seriously. Put yourself in the players shoes for a minute, what are we supposed to think? It seems like every situation is just going to be a crap shoot.
So are you setting precedence that if this same group of IB want to try and bully their way into a camp in the future they can just show up and cause a stink, petition, and roll for the camp to usurp it from people playing by rules that you have previously set? What?
I didn't ask you to mediate anything. And you both acknowledged that you have the information needed to make a ruling based on the rule that you made and then chose to ignore it and make up something completely different. Are you seriously going to sit here and lie that you didnt have logs of TMO killing FGs prior to the pop and that you didn't say that in game? Seriously?