Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Personally, I'd prefer if we had a "you clear it, it's yours" rule. The "one room" rule is in fact counterproductive when it comes to encouraging grouping. When you limit the amount of mobs any group can keep as part of their camp, you only encourage smaller group sizes. If you take a full group to lguk and can clear most of dead side, you may just end up losing 2/3 of your camp to rules lawyers. So why not just solo/duo a camp instead.
They put the special crypt rule in because it exposed the complete absurdity of the "one room" rule. It was really just a bandaid.
|
Is there a mandate to cater this game to groupers? Is there a mandate to encourage full groups rather than duos or trios? IMO a soloer or duo or trio should be looked at as having the same rights as a full group.
That being said, I prefer to respect when someone says they are holding down an area such as HS North. I'm just really confused because not to long ago a GM ruled you absolutely can lose 2/3 of your camp if you are soloing HS down and another group comes in and puts people at 2/3 of the camps you can't be at 100% of the time cause you're soloing and can only be at one spot at once. I was really annoyed at the ruling at the time but it seems to be the only consistent way to do things.... Letting CC's being a courtesy call and strickly having to be on the spawn point if someone wants to be a dick about the camps(and they have a right to be).
IDK I can go either way on this but I need to see a solid argument for holding camps without a physical presence right on those camps.