Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And I like how it went from playerA to assholeA. Your bias in this situation is showing. You clearly felt you have been wronged in this situation before and now are trying to punish people who don't play as you would like them to.
|
Keep your irrelevant commentary out of this discussion, thanks.
Quote:
|
Yes, I suspect that people would be upset when rules are laid out in the forums and a guide doesn't follow them. I also suspect people would be upset when a police officer showed up to their house and didn't follow the laws written down in the books. I don't even understand your point here. You aren't going to make everyone happy. So why not just follow the rules that are already in place instead of creating some new rule for this situation?
|
You mean like this one:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xzerion
Going forward, if you intend to hold or claim a camp, your group must retain presence at that camp. If you have no competition in the zone, you are more than welcome to hold as many as you like. The moment another party wants to claim a camp and you are "farming" multiple, you must decide which camp you want and forfeit the ones someone else is interested in. We still expect players to use the courtesy camp check before zerging a room. If there is a full spawn of mobs in a camp room up I think that would be considered not camped. How you pull the camp is up to you, as long as you are able to engage the mobs very shortly after they are spawned.
|
Hmm. Seems to be a clearly defined rule posted in the Camp, defined thread.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Orruar
Very simple. Whatever a person was clearing prior to a group moving is considered their camp. We don't have any pre-defined camps anyway. If a person wants to clear just the mobs inside the efreeti room and leave the rest of the trash up, why shouldn't they be allowed to? If another group comes in and starts doing the efreeti trash for xp, why shouldn't they both be happy in this situation? And if the person camping efreeti accidentally agros one of the mobs that belongs to the group, they can take it over to the group and offer it to them. Is it really that hard to apply common sense to this situation?
|
So if I'm a solo player killing a couple mobs in the GY in Mistmoore and a full group comes in to XP there, that full group has to work around the one player killing 2 mobs in that camp? What if he's killing 4 mobs, but can't clear any of the rest in time? That GY group of 6 basically has to move on to a different camp (which may or may not be available in that zone) because 1 guy is screwing that camp for the 6 people trying to XP there. "its all so simple" but you clearly don't see the problem with your reasoning, or why it's important to clearly define things.
Quote:
|
Do you understand this point?
|
Do you understand mine?