[Spitty]

This is favoritism.

You're favoring people and organizations that can essentially "rule-lawyer" a camper out of their camp. All the need to do is call in a couple people to make it look like the other spawns are being cleared, and I'm GM-booted out of a camp I have solid claim over.

If I, as a solo shaman, am sitting in a room on this server with the door closed and a single 23-minute spawn and I'm legitimately and successfully clearing that spawn every time it re-pops, I should be able to expect that I can maintain ownership of that camp. This is, and has been, a guaranteed scenario on this server many times over in many different situations.

You cannot enact a ruling that allows someone to override that by sheer numbers, and you cannot do that to a specific camp. You're making it a requirement now that a crypt camper be part of a guild or have a batphone-like ability to call in reinforcements to protect a completely legitimate camp.

That's absolutely wrong.

It doesn't matter if you're afraid of "rule lawyers". It doesn't matter that you think there's going to be more service instances where you need to show up. I can guarantee 100% that you'll see more instances and more intense situations if you try enforcing your ruling.

Guaranteed.