[kylok]

many lulz in this thread. Hate to burst your bubble Boggwin but you're only at the tip of the iceberg of "hard science". Take a few high end physics classes or physical chemistry, where they explain the how and why of you're supposed "intelligent design" then come back to me. Also - modern biology is firmly rooted in Darwinian evolution type logic so I'm not quite sure where you're pulling ID out of any bio class that isn't taught out of the humanities department. I can definitely understand your biased towards the intelligent design view point as you were probably raised with it, and repeatedly reinforce that brainwashing by going to church weekly. That being said, as a scientist, the hypothesis of intelligent design is TERRIBLE fucking science. I'll break it down for you as you clearly do not understand scientific method (what makes science science, as opposed to playing pin the tail on the donkey with origin theories). Hypothesis -> Experiment -> Results. If the results do not agree with the hypothesis you start over, you DO NOT tweak the experiment or fudge the hypothesis a little to match your results. What you have done is observed human biology, done no testing, and concluded that god (purposeful lowercase) made man. This is analogous to me saying look, the moon looks like cheese, I bet the moon is made of cheese, since I lack the knowledge and resources to test my hypothesis, I'll conclude that the moon is made of cheese - since I like cheese. Believe what you will but don't come and try to say that it's anything other than belief (not logic based). Imo stick to poli sci you're probably too old to adjust to mindset properly to do good science.