Quote:
Originally Posted by purist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I fail to see any contradiction. Yes, a server first involves dedication to achieve. No one disputes that. However, dedication alone , and dedication in and of itself, is not a sufficient criterion for a title. If you think it does, I have no problem showing you how quickly that argument stands up. It's not just about dedication, it's being the first. And not only is Bob not the first to offer such services, but the "services" are a retarded as a "server first" title. Lets give a "server first" to the first casino "services," too? Give a "server first" to the first guy to offer porting "services" for donations? Great idea, retard.
|
No one is trying to bust out the rulebook on why he should have a title. Its just a funny idea thats pretty awesome...you sound like a sad little dipshit.