[Combobreaker]

Originally Posted by Noselacri [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On Rallos, the consequence of itemloot was that many people refused to PvP, and the rest PvPed naked on druids and wizards or bagged their gear the instant they got attacked instead of trying to fight back, choosing to die without losing anything rather than fight and risk losing an item they might have worked for weeks to get. Almost everybody was hesitant to PvP "properly" until no-drop gear became widely available. Itemloot has always been violently anti-PvP, and anyone who thinks it encourages PvP or makes for more exciting fights is an idiot who has never tried it.

There's a reason only one server had itemloot and later removed it, and no noteworthy MMORPG has ever touched it with a ten foot pole since. It worked back in the UO days because the itemization was completely different and the gameplay didn't revolve 100% around the acquisition of items that you needed in order to play the game at all. That was an entirely different game where losing your gear didn't make most people feel strongly compelled to quit playing.

If T99 has itemloot, it is 100% guaranteed to be a dead server after a month. It's not even up to discussion, it's a fact that nobody has ever presented any kind of reasonable argument against. Polls will be skewed because the people who use these forums are disproportionally of the fucktard forum warrior orientation who think praising itemloot makes them look brave and hardcore, the kind of mongoloids who have been leaving a trail of shit all the way from VZ/TZ (which, incidentally, exploded in popularity when they got rid of itemloot, turning it from a server with like 50 players into one with hundreds.)

Nilbog 4 PRESIDENT of ITEM LOOT 2014