Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
did some reading at that site, work in a library after all, and there's a lot of holes in those defining arguments. the central idea of the individual's autonomy is essentially how societies formed anyway because it doesn't take a genius to understand safety in numbers. i refer you to the south park episode "die hippie die". same kind of reasoning is going on there, and a damn 4th grader calls them on their bullshit. the idea sounds wonderful but is unrealistic in that it depends upon an operating notion of everyone involved having the same morality. monoculture does nothing to enable growth of a person. humans learn best through conflict, but you operate wanting a sameness (you're anti-cultural-relativism statement earlier in the thread) which means you're just as impotent as my hypothesis stated. princess impotency i leave you with this:
|
You said I said autonomy, and that was correct, but everything else you said are not things I said.
If you want to discuss a particular "hole" in logic based on your reading of the very introductory page I linked, I suggest attending an anarchist bookfair and asking an anarchist, which I am - as I said - not.