Quote:
Originally Posted by Ele
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Opinion testimony is perfectly fine to support a conclusion. Please read up on Federal Rule of Evidence 701. If you can find for us an empirical double-blinded study of Flowing Thought that satisfies your criteria for a proper scientific study, then please share. Until then, we have to rely on contemporaneous posts which include opinions!
|
We actually don't have to rely on them.
Don't claim something as solved unless it is.
It might support a conclusion but it doesn't make a conclusion.
It would be reasonable to make a best guess not to conclude.
Luckily this isn't federal court and we don't need to rely on witness testimony. I'm sure you can probably think of a few cases were witness testified something that didn't stick.