Thread: Ranger or Monk?
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-17-2013, 01:30 PM
Lanuven Lanuven is offline
Fire Giant

Lanuven's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by webrunner5 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You are on Drugs if you think a Ranger can nearly out damage a Monk. They can't out damage a Warrior. Warriors are really not made to DPS like hell. Just take hits, hold agro.

There is a REASON nobody wants them. I have one myself. Good luck getting into a group or even soloing over 50. Hell even over level 30 is not easy.
Id sure like to see your comparison of these classes against each other with "on par" gear. You do realize rangers have spells that you cant parse unless you are the ranger right ?

Are you comparing epic monk to non-epic ranger? Then yeah, a ranger without 41% haste isnt going to keep up. Ive seen some of the weps warriors use in pickup groups and they are far from "good dps" weapons. 9/20 and 8/22 ( sarnak warhammer and yak skimmy) are the most popular from what I've seen. Then take into effect the DS the ranger should be casting if no one else is. Your not seeing the big picture of the ranger class. They don't do 1 or two things very well, they do multiple things about average. Utility class means just that.
Last edited by Lanuven; 10-17-2013 at 01:39 PM..