Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiddlywinks
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let's be clear here, I'm giving you the reasons people believe this. Most people know VP is a trainable zone just so GMs don't have to answer petitions there, despite when the rule was made this never being admitted to. It is the only really logical reason.
The off-topic what-ifs are simply to illustrate why these reasons occur.
If "IB/TR wouldn't have had VP to their own on a classic timeline" or "it was the way it was and there is no reason anybody should feel slighted over it" are your only 2 lines of reason then we need to stop discussing this topic right now because we are never going to reach common ground or agree.
You seemed confused about why people feel the way they do, I'm simply trying to show you how they do.
Arguing about whether they are right or wrong is just stupid and doesn't change anything.
|
Okay, let's go with reality. You say IB/TR deserved VP and TMO didn't. Nothing would have changed the release date of VP.
So, what is your answer to a VP keyed IB and a VP keyed TMO to the problem of IB deserves it and TMO doesn't?
Also, arguing about it is stupid, however people that are wrong should be identified as so, so they don't spread their wrong information to other people.