Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiddlywinks
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You said they didn't matter, then added your own.
Anyway, my posting the what-ifs is only to show you WHY people think that it was IB/TR that deserved VP at the time and not TMO/anyone else. If you can't, or refuse to understand that then I cannot help you in anyway, I am sorry.
I am the one being ignorant though, QED.
|
Yeah, I added my own, but it doesn't matter. I entertained an idea that does not matter. I gave you something of equal value back.
I don't see how that is difficult to understand, but I will put it like this. Our opinions on what may or may not have happened does not change anything nor does it add to or take away from what really did happen.
Your what ifs (and mine) don't show anything. People choose to believe what they want for whatever reasons. IB/TR deserved VP and they got it, the only alternative would be to push TMO out of VP and not allow them to raid it for months? This is what you're suggesting, yet you want a "fair" raiding system?