Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiddlywinks
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People know it wasnt done intentionally. That doesn't change the fact: IT HAPPENED. Another guild got to share IB/TR mobs because of it when they were rightly the only ones who would have been ready if it were opened on a classic timeline.
Do you ever stop and wonder what the raid scene would be like if the rules were the same, but TMO never got to share VP with TR/IB and TR/IB could have just kept TMO and anyone else out of the zone via training?
Probably not, because that's not what happened. Too bad for any other guilds such as FE that are up and come, because this is the exact fucking scenario they are facing and why they think things are not fair.
|
I don't stop and wonder, because it doesn't matter. You can play what ifs all day long, it doesn't matter because it didn't happen.
IB/TR could have chose not to rotate with TMO, but they did anyhow. IB/TR being in VP wouldn't have stopped TMO from getting keyed and the VP loot advantage wouldn't of helped IB/TR in VP when TMO did enter. Especially because IB/TR was a guild that had peaks in raiding and had multiple members come and go (from breaks) after gearing up.
I can honestly say nothing would have changed other than a few more IB members would have gotten more VP loot before TMO entered.