[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whether or not he is pro or anti war crimes has little relevance to his thoughts on aggressive military intervention.

The issue is whether these specific war crimes warrant military intervention.

If so, why us?

If us, why is it okay for us to do it outside established channels (United Nations)?

Even if we wanted to, can we even afford it?

If we can't do it in an official capacity because of Russia and China's security council vetoes, then it is Russia and China's fault.

Try to look at it less autistically and more like a rational person. And if we're talking war crimes, how about Guantanamo bay, waterboarding, extraordinary rendition, drone strikes, sponsoring Israel's behavior, etc etc etc

You sound a lot like the western nations in the 1930s.