Quote:
Originally Posted by pasi
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Or do you believe that this weapon is the lone example in the history of the game of a proc with an AC debuff that wasn't large aggro?
|
No, I agree that 100dd and -11ac should be good aggro.
I just don't get that people complained about the weapon not being good -- enough that it was eventually (or so it appears) change to just a simple +500hate 100dd.
Not trying to disagree with anyone here, just raising questions.
I just don't get the time line of the events and what people felt was so bad about it compared to other things.
Edit: The way I'm seeing it is the epic originally had less HP, 100dd, an AC and ATK debuff. From what we know about aggro right now -- the sheer amount of hate generated shouldn't be substantially different in any direction -- but the -40ATK will be pretty damn nice.
Old warriors, for some reason, complained about this until it was fixed to 500hate and 100dd.
What was bad about the original weapon, and what was better about the new weapon?
Perhaps the debuff portion can be resisted, giving no +aggro? Just throwing ideas out.