Quote:
Originally Posted by azeth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Guild 1 is sitting at the ent to NToV with 10 people (even a solid 10 people, main tank, clerics, whomever) and decides to start trash pulling while the remaining 10 show up for Eashen. If Guild 2 arrives 20 strong with Guild 1 still around 10, they would have been able to technically "leapfrog" Guild 1 by finishing trash pulls on the way to Eashen.
In the above example I can see where/how GM's would get involved if for instance Guild 1 (the one that was leapfrogged due to low numbers) ended up with 20 people in their raid before Guild 2 made it to Eashen.
So who technically gets the named? Consider - Guild 1 started trash, but without numbers. Guild 2 arrived with reasonable numbers and began trash, but Guild 1 accumulated a raid force before Eashen was engaged. In this instance I'm positive a GM would have granted the first chance at Eashen to Guild 2 IF they could provide proof via screenshot of Guild 1's numbers (10 people) at the time Guild 2 engaged trash with a raid-sized force.
|
I'm not quoting this because I wrote it, but over a few pages I feel people have in their owns words agreed to the end result of this example.
Can anyone argue in this example that Guild 2 does
not deserve rights to the first shot on Eashen?