Quote:
Originally Posted by Allizia
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The rest of this was already done, and failed.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allizia
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's funny, because this is how you guys got yourself into rotations, when we were using pretty much the exact same rules of engagement that you just listed.
|
I responded twice that I don't see how this idea is any different from the one we were using to begin with (that we manipulated and IB broke). Unless I am missing something? What does going back to the same rules that started all the issues solve?
I agree that the rotation is not a permanent solution, but until one is found, let me ask you this:
1) Has a GM been forced to intervene on any encounter since rotations were put into place? (MM is excluded, GM's were there for game mechanic issues, not guild drama)
2) Has IB been receiving a fair share of end game content since rotations were put into place?
3) Has Transcendence received a fair share of end game content since rotations were put into place?
4) Has anyone had to camp a raid target for 14 hours?
5) Will
any idea used appease everyone?
6) Aside from the forum QQing, are people in both guilds generally getting along better? I think so. Hell, I had long civil conversations with Hasbinbad and Tiki in the last 2 days = progress.
Seriously, things are not that bad on either side. It gives everyone time to find a real and lasting solution.