Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if the above happened, fuck zimmerman and he deserved to be convicted of a crime -- possibly even the third degree murder via child abuse that they tried to lay on him.
zimmerman had ZERO right to put his hands on martin or attempt to detain him. if he did, he committed a crime and martin was well within his rights to fight back.
but there's no reliable evidence that that's what happened. the only account we have says that trayvon initiated the physical contact and violence.
you seem to think it's ok if zimmerman grabbed his arm. it's not. if trayvon turned and walked away, he did exactly the right thing
|
You see, your opinion doesn't matter. Neither does mine. We can make up stories about what might have happened or what we think happened but it doesn't matter. Only two people know what happened. One is dead and the other says he defended himself. The state could not prove that Z murdered M or didn't act in self defense. That's all there is to it.
We as computer nerds like to play theorycraft and the general public loves crime dramas like those shitty CSI NCIS Law and Order shows and think they know forensics and law from TV. We can't solve this problem with missing information or making shit up like they do on TV though.
The only true fact we know is that Z has been found not guilty by a jury of his peers because the state could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he wasn't acting in self defense.