Your logic completely escapes me. There is no male testimony and no male to advocate for. The woman is an anonymous voice on the internet. It seems unlikely that she will ever even file charges. Yet somehow a chorus of hate needs to blame her for being raped and make excuses for his behavior.
I have not been referencing any general case. This is a specific instance. The statistics say what they say, and specious arguments will never counter evidence. Switching rapidly between a single instance and a general case introduces informal fallacies of hasty generalization and slothful induction. Seriously, try to think better.
|