Quote:
Originally Posted by Alawen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You, along with Bardalicious and Daldolma, are approaching this subject from an unexamined perspective which leads you to simplified opinions which exclude a statistically significant percentage of human population. That is not science. Masculinity and femininity, like most human attributes, apparently follow a normal distribution. Outliers are part of the curve in both biology and psychology, not distinct from it.
|
Rhetorical questions here, please don't bother answering as you are afflicted with the same myopia as the rest of the faux-progressive pseudo-intellectual white knights grandstanding in this thread.
Other than you just not liking the cut of my jib, why would my perspective be "unexamined" and yours well-considered?
Who have I "excluded" from anything?
When did I make any scientific claims?
Do you realize that normal distributions allow for very few outliers? Gaussian curves imply a smooth gradient, not a significant number of outliers. I agree there is a spectrum of sexuality, but I do not agree that it follows a normal distribution or that it fails to include some pretty wild and populous extremes. The evidence that men are
generally attracted to pussy to the point of preoccupation is everywhere. There is a massive genetic bias toward heterosexuality, but pointing this is out is not a de facto attack on any of the shit that you like, and it does nothing to limit the variety of sex/gender identities.
I know you wish I would dehumanize you so you could talk to me like I'm right-wing scum, but it isn't going to happen. You get equal respect from me until you start witch-hunting.