Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So I can have fun shooting them down, of course. As much as I'd enjoy shooting down counter-arguments. Because...the fact is that there is not enough real evidence to support either side conclusively...at the moment. Which I said in my *cough* rambling.
|
Well my whole thing about this as with most anything is that when someone approaches me or the general population with a theory, idea, presumption, declaration, the burden of providing conclusive evidence falls upon their shoulders. This applies to global warming, climate change (their new buzz word since climategate), 911 truthers, fake moon landing crowd, or any other idea that has not been substantiated with conclusive evidence. Until there is solid proof, not just a “trust me” argument, no action should be taken, zero. No cap and trade. No Kyoto accord. No UN global warming initiative. No anything that comes down the pike.
I see nothing but a full fledged scam perpetrated by get-rich-quick power hungry con-artists, from scientists down to politicians. I say that because they try to force all this stuff on us with simply a "trust me" argument. That's indicative of a con-artist. All they need are jackboots and their attire would be complete. Prolly on layaway for the moment...