Except that prior to this post there had never been a rule or concern raised about retaining the bind, so much so that in fact Amelinda and others knew about it and specifically stated it wasn't an issue. Now we're told that anything she ever said doesn't matter and it's an exploit. It's fine and dandy you want to change binds going forward, and everyone should comply with the rule, but it doesn't make sense to call it an exploit given the history. It also seems inconsistent that when the CT cycle was triggered a month ago we used Amelinda's ruling per Sirken / Zade, but now with this issue Amelinda's ruling doesn't matter. Which is it?
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
|