Quote:
Originally Posted by Hailto
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is no more evidence for the hairy tall guy in the woods, than there is for the existence of a deity. Why do you feel comfortable saying big foot doesn't exist, but you don't feel comfortable when faced with the same evidence for god's existence?
The scope of the question should not affect how you view the evidence.
|
Your issues seem to be primarily contextual.
I would say it's a fair assumption that it's
likely Bigfoot doesn't exist.
You're also arguing with HBB who has formally stated several times he's against the bridging between atheism and agnosticism so take that as it is.