Quote:
Originally Posted by stormlord
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's hard and harder to compare players from different eras because the rules change. So even already it's difficult to compare a shooting guard today to the likes of Micheal Jordan. And then even moreso it's difficult to compare another position in the lineup to the position Micheal Jordan was popularly known for IN A SINGLE ERA.
Many people do not know that Micheal Jordan is #2 - only under Wilt Chamberlain - in consecutive all time triple doubles. This happened during a short time in the 1988-89 season when he was the starting point guard for the Chicago Bulls. Only Magic Johnson had more triple doubles in the 1988-89 season.
Another thing people don't popularly know is that MIcheal Jordan was an all defensive player of the year in 1987-88 and there're only 17 players on that list over the past 30 years. MJ was a stellar shot blocker and stealer. This is really what made him so famous. Otherwise, he'd just be a ball hog that's a good shooter.
I don't think you can compare him to Lebron, but I do think I like Lebron more. Why? Because I think Lebron is probably a better passer and has served the role as leader at a higher standard. The thing about Micheal is he had a very hard exterior. He was not a natural leader, but was pushed into the role somewhat.
I researched Micheal Jordan for a while some time ago. I came away with huge respect for him. His stats, viewable on nba.com, are monumental. Clearly, the man was much more than a ball hog. In fact, if hte stats are to be believed, he blows away Kobe Bryant. It's not even an argument.
But as I already said, with how things change, it makes stat comparisons difficult.
Another great is Magic Johnson. There's a reason these names float around, like Wilt Charmlain or Larry Bird.
One player I love to watch is James Harden. Good player. I wish he'd stayed with the Thunder.
|
The rule changes are very important. Not many folks know that Wilt scored that 100 without the three point line. I think the 24 was implemented then though. Very much agree with you on the stats and era synchronicity. There's a context that isn't taken into account with most of the player comparisons. Jordan is the best that's played, for now, and I think that that's what people do and don't like.
I started really watching basketball when Duncan was starting out, and now have seen his career arc ( one for the thumb would be nice for him but they weren't stopping James and Wade) which I think is what you were referring to earlier with the generational point and how folks watched.
Harden, Durant and James are the ones I keep an eye on atm, and feel kind of spoiled having those three; but it's probably similar to the 80's when Bird and Johnson were sharing the league. And that Harden trade was terrible, but awesome for the Rockets.