Project 1999 - Runed Fighters Staff vs. TStaff

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Blue Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=17)

- - Runed Fighters Staff vs. TStaff (/forums/showthread.php?t=76712)

Runed Fighters Staff vs. TStaff

Which is better at higher levels? Which is better at lower levels? Discuss.

1-30 RFS
30-60 Tstaff

Have done no research but I am probably right

1-50 rfs
50-60 tstaff until epic then dual fists or epic fist mh + sos scondary

then top end is
wu's fist + epic mh
or 2x wu's fist

best is bo staff of trorsmang

I've just hit 50 and I must say the Tranquil Staff profs more than any other weapon I've experienced!

It procs just as much as an Adamantite club, but does more damage. To be honest I prefer Imbued Fighters staff over RFS/Tstaff at 50+. Any weapon over 40 delay seems to have a substantially higher damage bonus and at 40 delay with max haste at lvl 60 you're talking about some serious dps. I'll prolly get flamed for saying this but 29/30 with 100 dd/stun is nice for soloing but for all out DPS I almost always parse higher with IFS or AC/SoS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 (Post 664803)

At any level the damage bonus differential between a T Staff and an Imbued Fighters Staff is 1.

The Tranquil Staff is simply better because of the lower delay and the damage bonus being applied more often.

I'm unsure how you could be parsing higher with the Imbued Fighters Staff -- The only advantage it has over a Tranquil Staff is the + 1 (No Proc, Slightly worse ratio).

Code:

(MEDIUM) IF WeaponDelay >= 28 AND <= 39 

1.) DamageBonus = One Handed DamageBonus + (Level - 27) / 4



(SLOW) IF WeaponDelay >= 40 AND <= 42

1.) DamageBonus = One Handed DamageBonus + ((Level - 27) / 4) + 1

I thought any weapon with 40+ delay had a larger damage bonus than those without, I could be wrong. But I do regularly parse higher with IFS then monks around the same level as me, usually only use IFS with max haste.