Project 1999 - Bard, Shammy or Druid?

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)

- Red Server Chat (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=54)

- - Bard, Shammy or Druid? (/forums/showthread.php?t=54871)

Rust1d?

11-18-2011 10:53 AM

Bard, Shammy or Druid?

Played both Druid and Bard on live, mostly druid though. I had a bard and I really liked to play him, but by the time I got him to 50, the game went to shit. Played a shammy on a shitty V/TZ 3.0 till level 35 but was 2 boxing so I never got a "full experience".

pickled_heretic

11-18-2011 11:04 AM

dear god anything but a druid

your other choices are legit though

jrwriter

11-18-2011 11:17 AM

Shamans don't get real good till 34

pickled_heretic

11-18-2011 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrwriter (Post 468661)

Shamans don't get real good till 34

shamans are always good, they don't get "rdic OP" until 34+...

Rust1d?

11-18-2011 11:29 AM

They get their first pet at 35 right?

Doors

11-18-2011 11:29 AM

Shamans are weak and underpowered like the rogue. Go bard.

pickled_heretic

11-18-2011 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doors (Post 468670)

Shamans are weak and underpowered like the rogue. Go bard.

0/10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rust1d? (Post 468669)

They get their first pet at 35 right?

34, they also get Ebolt at 34 which is quite potent and hard to resist (or it was on live)

and of course Cannibalize, which is a game-changer for shamans at lvl 34

34 is a huge level, i'm not going to lie, but shamans are always good, not JUST at 34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.