The largest peer reviewed encyclopedia in the world is not a credible source
 

I liked how my professors would gladly accept any random geoshitties webpage made by some crackhead who just rambled vaguely about the topic at hand in order to collect some AdSense money, but always QQ'd if I used Wikipedia.

Also Britannica, likely written by 4 old dudes with wrinkly balls, is perfectly acceptable.

I mean have you even ever tried trolling Wikipedia? Those nerds revert fake shit before the page even refreshes. To be perfectly honest, there is -literally- no reason to even go to college now that Wikipedia exists except to get a shiny piece of paper that says you are only half-lazy.

yeah good luck learning everything a math degree will teach you using wikipedia alone.

http://wolframalpha.com


next

good luck trying to figure out how to find how to please the G-spot while simultaneously stimulating the clit using wikipedia alone

That site cannot create an arc length parametrization or compute a surface integral or create a differential equation that describes population based on multiple parameters.

That piece of shit can't even work a goddamn word problem.

britannica is the worst piece of shit ive ever used to research anything. i ended up using wikipedia for my research paper on the civil war and just cited random britannica articles cause i was required to. got a B :)

SNAP

naez just got
http://www.gifsoup.com/view/261697/u...fugg-out-o.gif

im eating m&m cookies from pathmark and a huge can of roasted nuts come at me.