Which casters get the least out of Firepots bind?
 

I have an enchanter with firepots bind. Not sure how I feel about it given that enchanters DO tend to die and it's advantageous to bind outside the instance. Also, Enchanters can enjoy/solo Velious content and if need be always hammer to Kunark just like anyone else.

Necromancers are more limited in Velious and for them a Firepot bind perhaps makes the most sense because of this. Sadly I didn't manage to get an ikky necro bound there.

Mages, hmm, they don't really solo much at all in Kunark or anywhere else, hammer sorta gets them to where they need to go anyway. Not sure how useful or unuseful a firepot bind would be for a mage.

Wizards can port.

- What's your take ?

Has to be mage,they just get parked in one spot and log in for 15 mins.
For leveling they also would want to be bound where their hunting, so even then I would think mage.

I eventually got Vessel Drozlin on a quake using my Enchanter's firepot bind, so that was nice. Velious was a lot more playable after I gave the bind up. I'm not sure if I would bind there on a fresh server. I loved the convenience for banking. For HS I could just bank my OT hammer and use that for corpse recovery, but it might make more sense to just be able to bind at seb when doing seb during kunark.

Seems like porters gain the least.

Very nice to have access to a pots bound epic cleric.

Yea not binding a cleric on green hurts my soul still.

prob mages since they need a group to do anything

Go ask on quarm forum

Eh, firepots seems meaningless on quarm with luclin and PoP

Well you can't bind there on p99 so it's a moot point all around

Fire pots seem a fast way to a few spires so also fairly fast to nexus and nk or gd too.

I have low level characters that are bound there and I expect there to be another fresh server at some point, i.e. I could make a necro in the future and play for instance a mage today. I could also forego my firepot bound enchanter for a gnome one because gnomes are cool.