You claim muslims dont condem terrorisim
 

Yet neither do americans.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...ef3_story.html

They aint no different than you or I they just believe in a different ghost story.

Why can't we just say religion, in a radical nature, is to blame.

Are you and I religious Republicans?

And the point was never as simplistic as "they don't condemn terrorism", but that they have incompatible cultural values on a wide range of issues ranging from free speech, women's rights, due process, the rule of law, etc, and they tend to resist assimilation.

Take all the hate, retardation, and backwardness associated with Republicans on this one issue, abortion, and multiply it by 10, and you get something like Sharia law.

If anything, this is an example of why religious-motivated values tend to be shit values, Christian or Muslim. You see how annoying it is when they cling violently to one belief like this, imagine if it were 20 of them.

I liked this part:

"Second, conservatives have blamed Black Lives Matter protesters for inspiring the killing of police officers; what makes my critique fair and theirs not?

The answer is pretty simple actually. BLM has explicitly called for the death of police officers. Republican presidential candidates have not.

On topic:

I don't follow how this relates to condemning terrorism. Republican candidates as well as a number of anti-abortion organizations have condemned the attack.

Also, even if we take a step back and assumed for a moment that the attack had not been condemned. How would that justify other random acts of violence?

yowl:

http://www.idioms4you.com/img/angif-...lposts-def.gif

outlaw religion on pain of immediate death

Id prefer outlawing the republican party first - then religion after.

This guy cries about fascism more then Alan Colmes, yet calls for fascism to solve his problems. Oh the hypocrisy