Stun or Lifetap proc - which aggros better?
 

I'm wondering if anyone has any qualitative or quantitative evidence on what is better for aggro: 2 x Blood Point or 2 x Sarnak Warhammer.

Blood Points (10/21) are cheaper and have a better dmg/delay ratio than Sarnak Warhammers (9/20), AND the proc does 80dd. My question is which proc pisses a mob off more...being stunned or being lifetapped? And does anyone know how long the stun lasts from proc of the Sarnak Warhammer?

If I were to buy one 1 x Blood Point and 1 x Sarnak Warhammer, which one should go in my mainhand if I only cared about the aggro?

If there is a list somewhere that shows the amount of hate generated by all spells/procs, I'd be grateful if you posted a link to it because I could not find one.

stun, slow, and snare procs all have much more aggro than DD or lifetap procs

if you had one of each, sarnak in main hand for more aggro, bloodpoint in main hand for more damage

You want Stun. Lifetaps are only relatively small aggro.

Danth

stun proc better agro by far


its not even close

Awesome, thanks guys. Saved me from spending 5-6k on Blood Points to test it out myself.

Bloodpoints are just fun weapons, hands down stun for agro.

sarnak warhammer is lore. When i was playing my war i used a warhammer in main and blood point in offhand. Was enough agro to hold over monks and rogues and the bloodpoint lifetap helps slow down your health drop

Stun is definitely better aggro, but a warrior with two bloodpoints is pretty awesome for soloing or duoing with a priest. I did the better part of 58-60 on my war solo/duo in KC. With BPs, fungi and using evasive a lot, it was actually pretty efficient.