question about pnp
 

so ive been killed twice on a corpserun the last few days (which i dont care about) but i have a question now:

if i ever see one of those players doing a cr themself in the future, am i allowed to kill? i do even consider to exp death/delevel them if i catch them at their bindspot to give em a lesson about red dawns pnp. this would be also a better way to police those players instead of writing a QQ-thread on the report board here (i never did). those gms have more important stuff to do after all!

some answer from a gm would be great cause i dont want to risk an (unjustified) ban.

thanks
<3

What kind of a question is that

Hey officer, i saw this guy speed on the highway at 150mph, if i see that guy again, can i zoom past him at 180mph to give him a lesson?

P.S. PnP sucks

i just dont have the patience to write some QQ-thread in the petition forum just because someone killed me on a CR but unfortunately there are alot of whiny kids on this server going straight to the petition board writing down a novel the moment they get killed on a cr.

thats basicaly why iam asking cause i dont want to get "fucking banned" (sirken®)

gonna kill u naked next time I see you hehehehe

gonna corpse camp you afterwards when i see u naked if gm allows me huehuehuehue

I'm 26-0 since leaving Nilly. Brobb/dad/RL friend Rod on my cleric have died but not me. In others words good luck seeing me naked.

yeah ive already heard that u obtained all pixels u needed in nihilum and left afterwards

I dont know what is going on about this PnP.

2 weeks ago, Thumperx killed my ench in seb, I spawn in TT naked, get dotted by some necro tagged nihilum, then Thumperx preceeds to zone out, and kill me again in TT, ALL within literally 30 seconds.

I sent a video to the GMs and have not received a response since.

Not sure if the GMs care at this point, but I see more and more people violating PnP, Not sure what else to think.

use that hobbit brain of yours

Pretty sure the thread Derubael made a few days ago and the ideas contained within it are just discussion points and not actually implemented. The original PNP is still in place, correct? In which case what you outlined above would not be considered a PNP violation, at least explicitly.