Project 1999

Project 1999 (/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic (/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   We knew 64-bit Linux > Windows, but for those still on 32-bit Linux is even better (/forums/showthread.php?t=113969)

r00t 07-04-2013 03:09 AM

We knew 64-bit Linux > Windows, but for those still on 32-bit Linux is even better
 
I've set out to debunk the long-standing, false myth that 32-bit operating systems are capped at a maximum of 4GB of RAM.

There is nothing stopping 32-bit operating systems from using more than 4gb of RAM. It's true that you can only count so high an address space using 32 bit binary, but processors have had workarounds around this forever, basically using offsets (think how double IEEE 754 floating points work).

What I'm saying is, 32-bit Linux distros can support like 100gb of ram ez pz. Its M$ that artificially caps it at 4gb, so you are forced to buy the more expensive "model".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_GB_ba...n_dependencies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wikipedia
In computing, Physical Address Extension (PAE) is a feature to allow 32-bit x86 processors to access a physical address space (including random access memory and memory mapped devices) larger than 4 gigabytes.

[...]

First implemented in the Intel Pentium Pro in 1995, it was extended by AMD

[...]

a limit deliberately coded by Microsoft into the "non-server", or "client", x86 editions of Microsoft Windows: Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Windows 7.

As far as gaming on Linux is concerned:

EQEmu - Silver Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...sion&iId=20308
Diablo III - Platinum Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...tion&iId=13484
Guild Wars 2 - Gold Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...tion&iId=14130
Planetside 2 - Bronze Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...tion&iId=14466
World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria - Platinum Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...ation&iId=1922
Star Wars TOR - Silver Rating - http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManage...tion&iId=13553

Wine is not an emulator, it is an imitator (directly linking DirectX calls to OpenGL/SDL/etc counterparts), so you will often find better performance as Linux is much less of a resource hog.


Make the switch today:

http://www.ubuntu.com/
https://www.archlinux.org/
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://www.kali.org/
http://linuxmint.com/

or any of a thousand other, 100% totally free *nix operating systems

SamwiseRed 07-04-2013 03:50 AM

i like linux mint, used it for awhile but eq played like shit on it. could just be my shitty comp. gonna builda new one soon tho.

EchoedTruth 07-04-2013 06:34 PM

Ubuntu is great but it is too much of a pain in the ass dealing with compatibility

DoucLangur 07-05-2013 03:22 AM

Debian Squeeze ran EQ almost out of the box. But I had to switch back to Win when I ran into serious troubles after installing support for the EQEmuLauncher (fuck that shitty program, I thought it was required from then on to get patch files at all).

Whenever I get the time on my hands, I'll go back to Debian.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.