![]() |
Atramentous Shield should be back slot usable
I came across an old SK forum that stopped threads in 2002...i found out that apparently this shield was back slot usable in our time frame (post is from 08/01 and he says it was a year prior to this at least)...here's the link to the thread: http://thecrossroadstavern8833.yuku....cs#reply-50493 and a quote:
"Unless you got a CoF try getting a Ashenbone for Regular use and a Atrementous for your back ( It still fits on your back doesn't it? I remember about a year ago it did ) NE ways failing that do what everyone else says and Harmtouch me when you see me for being a waste of bandwidth." |
Strange I can't find patch notes indicating they changed it to secondary only. I wonder if he's confused with lodi shield? He doesn't seem to confident in that post
|
yeah it was a good find for me, i never played a SK so i dont have a clue, maybe it was one of those things that only SK's knew about - do you have a list of all the patch notes?
|
|
they dont post everything they change thats for sure. but it is true the guys post seems pretty vague .. but damn this would be hella cool
|
Quote:
|
I cannot find any archived sites that list this as back slot, only secondary.
Pre-Velious item descriptions did not show the slots that were equipable. It seems very unlikely with 28 AC. |
Quote:
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=2193 |
Quote:
The only thing that comes close is Shield of the Immaculate and this item is very well documented being Back/Secondary useable. Nirgon could have his friend look it up in the old database to see if it was ever changed. |
I'm pretty sure in that comment the person was confused with Lodi shield.
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/item.html?item=4061 The comment was posted post velious also /shrug |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.